Agent tool gateway
Register HTTPS tools with explicit destinations, typed arguments, resource scopes and execution limits.
Manage tool access →THE CONTROL PLANE FOR AI AGENT ACTIONS
Bring tools, policies and AI signals into one security workspace. Give your agents the access they need, with a clear boundary around what they can do.
0.3.0-rc.16 · Evaluation release candidate · Production acceptance required
read-documentSucceededlower-trust sendDeniedrestricted-sendApprovalIllustrative interface with synthetic examples. View the recorded walkthrough to inspect the actual decisions.
ONE WORKSPACE. CONNECTED CONTROLS.
A purpose-built gateway and console for the boundary between AI agents and the systems they act on.
Register HTTPS tools with explicit destinations, typed arguments, resource scopes and execution limits.
Manage tool access →Apply data labels and bounded content checks. Encrypt sensitive stored payloads; use endpoint encryption when both ends support it.
Explore the data boundary →Compare a local model signal with the current policy decision. Analyze synthetic arguments before executing a tool.
Open the workbench →Review approvals bound to the exact request. Changed, expired or reused approvals cannot authorize a different action.
Review action requests →Validate numerical model candidates separately, inspect evidence, and explicitly promote or roll back observation versions.
Explore model controls →Investigate action records, verify the local audit chain, and review service readiness and recorded backup outcomes.
Review verification evidence →A BOUNDARY YOU CAN INSPECT
A model signal is one input to investigation. Every tool call still passes through the gateway’s identity, schema, resource and information-flow checks.
Only calls routed through Aegivora can be evaluated. Your integration must restrict direct access around the gateway.
An identified agent submits a task, a named tool and typed arguments.
Permissions, labels and configured content rules determine whether the request can proceed.
A reviewer can approve only the exact request before it expires.
Retain encrypted payloads and a keyed audit chain. Uncertain external outcomes require reconciliation.
A DEDICATED WORKSPACE
Designed for a separate operator-managed deployment per organisation, with its own database and encryption keyring. Your team uses the console and JSON-over-HTTPS API.
The current hosted service is an evaluation environment. Production use requires completed security, recovery and integration acceptance.
SEE THE WORKFLOW FOR YOURSELF
Explore five recorded synthetic outcomes, assess your workflow fit and prepare an evaluation worksheet. No customer data or account is needed for the walkthrough.
KNOW THE SCOPE
This release candidate is for controlled evaluation with synthetic data. It has not undergone an independent penetration test, compliance certification, or a customer production acceptance test.
A single-node policy gateway, encrypted sensitive records, wrapped cloud keyring, registered HTTP tools, scoped principals, exact-request reviews, organisation sign-in, audit console and backup helper. Optional endpoint encryption includes a customer-side SDK. An experimental local English classifier includes separate training, validation, promotion and rollback. Optional external model suggestions require a separately configured deployment.
Enterprise teams connecting authorized AI agents to registered HTTPS tools. The product website is public; the console and tool APIs require provisioned identities. Each customer needs an isolated deployment and tested integrations.
Ordinary calls use HTTPS and encrypted storage; the gateway can read their payloads. Optional endpoint-encrypted tools use signed JWE requests and responses, with private keys held by the customer’s agent and tool. In that mode Aegivora sees ciphertext and routing metadata, and cannot inspect content. Both endpoints require integration and key custody; this mode is not yet validated with a customer deployment.
Local rules screen ordinary tool requests and responses for selected credential formats, email addresses, payment-card candidates and common prompt-injection patterns. For end-to-end encrypted calls, these checks run in the customer’s agent and tool SDK, where plaintext exists. The gateway cannot inspect ciphertext or prove that endpoint checks ran. Rules can miss attacks or block legitimate content; a no-match result is not a safety guarantee.
Task and concurrency budgets bound repeated actions. Optional tool-level approval and response schemas add checks. Repeated uncertain outcomes stop a tool until an administrator resets its circuit. A persistent emergency stop blocks execution. Local size and timing statistics freeze after 30 successful calls and flag unusual changes for review; they never grant access or modify code. These statistics are not a trained AI security classifier.
A separate, resource-limited training process updates numerical classifier weights from approved labelled datasets. Fixed synthetic tests, administrator promotion and rollback control releases. The hosted service currently runs the advisory v3 classifier; the v4 candidate below has not been promoted. No paid LLM is configured. The v4 update trains on 512 examples: 368 authored development records and 144 public training records. It retains all 80 visible regression cases, which informed development. On public test splits after candidate selection, it flags 13 of 60 labelled attacks with 1 of 56 false alarms in deepset, and 105 of 112 attack-selected Lakera examples, with two abstentions. Compared with v3, deepset attack recall is unchanged, false alarms fall from four to one, and the Lakera flagged count rises from 64 to 105. These small, biased public sets expose remaining misses and do not establish enterprise accuracy. Runtime scores are advisory only. The model cannot train on live customer traffic, change security rules, deploy application code or grant access.
Only actions routed through the gateway are evaluated. Customers must restrict direct access to tools and must configure appropriate labels, resource scopes, destinations and network controls.
Review the included release checklist: deployment validation, identity integration, backup recovery, adversarial testing, independent security review, incident response, support terms, and customer acceptance. High availability and native MCP transport are not included. Automated customer provisioning and live payment activation remain unverified. Billing integration and private installation setup are included as source.